Review: God 2.0

Hey readers!

It's time for my review of God 2.0.
What would you ask God? What if you didn’t like the answer? In this religious satire by Kent based Blueberry Goose Theatre Group, God gives a monthly interview answering ANY question. For Ash Pentel, a troubled heavy-weight political journalist and this month’s interviewer, the right answer could be a life saver.

The story of God 2.0 is designed to make the audience question the perceived nature of God, as well as organised religion as a whole. The show seeks to tackle a wide range of philosophical issues, primarily focusing on criticisms aimed at the traits of the Christian God. For example, if God is omni-benevolent and omniscient, then why does he not use his powers to intervene and prevent human suffering? There was some interesting commentary throughout, especially in regards to the consequences of allowing human beings to have complete and utter free will. God's answers to such questions were well-scripted and interesting to listen to. I particularly enjoyed listening to the first answer,  which explored the way in which one small use of negative free will can lead to endless suffering, thus presenting the argument that free will may not be so good after all. Beyond the main story, there is also an underlying subplot throughout that God's interviewer is suffering from suicidal tendencies. The true intention of this subplot felt a little unclear however and only minimal explanation was provided. As a consequence, I would have liked to have seen this expanded upon in more detail.

God 2.0 consists of five cast members, however there were two performances in particular which stood out. Firstly, I rather admired Inez Thorn's portrayal of the first God. Thorn had a very interesting characterisation that was strikingly different to her fellow God's. She portrayed the role as being rather relaxed throughout, which made for an intriguing contrast. The strongest performance however came from Malcolm Jeffries, who portrayed God #3. Jeffries interpreted God as being quite an emotional being, which was both effective and fascinating to witness. He was well and truly captivating, and he stole the spotlight whenever he entered the stage. Jeffries really did deliver a remarkable performance.

Now for my final verdict on God 2.0. I give God 2.0...

Whilst the subplots could have been developed further, God 2.0 does give a fair amount of interesting commentary, as well as some excellent performances.

Think it should have got a higher rating? Agree with my rating? Think it should have got a lower rating? If so comment below.

Thanks for reading!

-The Basic Theatre Reviewer

Review: Different From The Others

Hey readers!
It's time for my review of Different From The Others.
It's 1919, World War I has ended, men are holding hands in public, Moscow and St Petersburg are gay and free from discrimination and Germany, feeling the full brunt of blame is yet to establish itself. It was then that Magnus Hirschfeld, a German Sexologist and founding father of gay activism seized the opportunity to create the first pro-gay film ever to be made.

The aspect of Different From The Others that makes it so compelling is that it is based on a true story. Whilst playwright Claudio Macor has taken certain artistic licenses in order to further the narrative, the vast majority of what we see on stage is actually quite factual. As a keen historian, I found this fascinating. Despite having extensively studied this period of history, I had not previously been aware of these particular events. As a consequence, I was delighted to have my eyes opened to this significant tidbit of history. Different From The Others tells an utterly intriguing story, and it leaves you wanting to find out more. Upon leaving the theatre, I conducted further research into the events depicted in the play, as well as the characters featured. It is a thoroughly interesting piece of work, and it was an utter delight to watch.

Different From The Others consists of a small cast of six, including Christopher Sherwood, Beth Eyre, Benjamin Garrison, Jeremy Booth, Simon Stallard and Jordan Alexander. All six cast members were phenomenal; there was not a weak link among them. Each and every one of them brought something unique to the stage, and they all worked well as a collective, creating an excellent stage dynamic. A special mention must be given to Simon Stallard, who portrayed the role of Karl Giese. Stallard was highly believable in the role, and successfully conveyed the heartbreaking innocence and naivety of his character. He particularly excelled in the penultimate scene, whereby he made it quite evident the extent to which Karl was torn between his former love for Dr Magnus Hirschfield and his new allegiance to Nazism. Beth Eyre's spell-binding portrayal was also an overall highlight of the show. She had such a natural stage presence, and conjured the perfection characterisation for Anita Berber. Eyre convincingly portrayed Berber's troubled and complex personality, causing the character's eventual demise to be well and truly heart-rending.

Now for my final verdict on Different From The Others. I give Different From The Others...

Different From The Others is an intriguing piece of work, detailing a unique part of history. In addition to this, there also are a number of masterful performances.

Think it should have got a higher rating? Agree with my rating? Think it should have got a lower rating? If so comment below.

Thanks for reading!

-The Basic Theatre Reviewer